Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deivid Penchev


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Deivid Penchev

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Made a 36 min appearance over 10 years ago in a professional league but then quickly dropped out of professional football and played in amateur leagues for the remainder of his career. Whilst there is a presumption of WP:GNG from this one appearance, many AfDs have established consensus that this is invalid. A Bulgarian search came back with nothing of note and Google searches came back with a passing mention in Top Sport, which has him down as the godfather for a fellow footballer's child. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:05, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 17:10, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep passes NFOOTY.--Ortizesp (talk) 02:44, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Longstanding consensus regarding WP:NFOOTY is that players that squeak by with 1 or 2 appearances despite thoroughly failing WP:GNG are not notable. Curbon7 (talk) 07:15, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Without prejudice to change vote to Keep if significant coverage is later found. For my search, I was unable to find WP:SIGCOV for the subject, noting that someone with searching skills for Bulgarian/Cyrillic sources might uncover things I was unable to. Until that point, my vote stands as delete. GauchoDude (talk) 14:23, 2 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.