Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dejan Čugalj


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Tavix ( talk ) 15:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Dejan Čugalj

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator on the grounds that he has played pro football in Croatia and Serbia, and that he will play pro football in Germany. None of these assertions are supported by reliable sources, and speculation as to future appearances is never grounds for notability. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:23, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:24, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 07:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 07:27, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as not meeting WP:NFOOTY, at least not right now. — foxj 19:21, 7 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.