Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dejan Bandović (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:28, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Dejan Bandović
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It's been six years since the last deletion, but the underlying notability concerns remain the same. He has still not played in a fully professional league or received significant coverage, meaning the article still fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:49, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:49, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:42, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:43, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:07, 6 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete and SALT - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 07:42, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. I expanded the article. Passes GNG with flying colors, having won the 2013/14 national cup, and the 2015/16 national league. Even more notably, he became widely known in the region for the 2017 "Cener affair", duly recorded in the article. WP:BEFORE, anyone? No such user (talk) 09:14, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. The instance of him rejecting a bribe is WP:BLP1E. Fenix down (talk) 11:28, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - although a number of the sources below are simply routine transfer talk, sources 2 and 3 indicate GNG. Fenix down (talk) 08:59, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I'm not going to NAC it as keep because there a couple "weak"s. I also don't think we would need this to be salted.
 * Comment. How is the following not an application that the subject has garnered "significant reliable coverage for any other achievements":
 * Coverage of his Velež-Sarajevo transfer, 2012
 * Interview to Radio Sarajevo, 2013
 * , interview, 2014, where he was qualified as "one of best individuals in the match against the neighbors"
 * Invited to national team, but ended short of playing a match, 2014
 * Coverage of his Sarajevo-Olimpic transfer, 2015
 * Vast coverage from 2017, and the affair, now in the article.
 * For what it's worth, the Premier League became fully professional in 2016-17 season.
 * And all this coverage is subject of multiple published[2] non-trivial[3] secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent,[4] and independent of the subject. (WP:SPORTBASIC)
 * What we have here is a solid, long-standing player in a country's top-tier league, on the verge of the national team. Who also has won the national championship and cup. And is notable for a role in a sports affair as well. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS notwithstanding, what's the reason to nominate the one actually notable player among the crowd at Category:FK Olimpik Sarajevo players? Is e.g. Almir Pliska, with 1 reference, automatically notable because he played 2 caps for Partizani Tirana back in 2014, in supposedly fully-professional league? No such user (talk) 14:11, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Fails NFOOTY as having not played in a professional league or a national team but may pass WP:GNG per the references and content No such user has provided. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 01:37, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:35, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write)   )evidence(  22:34, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. I feel like I must be missing something here, but the article subject clearly meets WP:NFOOTY: he's listed as a first-team player for FK Olimpik, which is part of a a fully-professional league by the standards of WikiProject Football. If he's played any matches for them — which is likely as he's a first-team player — then that meets criterion 2 of NFOOTY. Even if he doesn't, it seems like there was extensive coverage of the bribery scandal he was involved in, which meets the bar of WP:GNG.  A  Train talk 10:35, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * – the missing pieces is that I updated the FPL page during the course of this AfD, as it became FPL in 2016, and nobody has updated FK Olimpik recently – they don't play in the Premier League of Bosnia and Herzegovina anymore, and were relegated in the meantime. Still, as I discussed on FPL talk, that's a pretty lousy criterion for "borderline professional leagues" such as Bosnian, Macedonian or Montenegrin. No such user (talk) 12:52, 17 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.