Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dejan Ristić


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:12, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Dejan Ristić

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article's subject fails to meet WP:GNG. A search on GoogleNews produces no hits, a regular Google search shows pages of statistics but no substantive coverage. I have verified that there are no articles on him in either the Serbian or Serbo-Croatian Wikipedias. While he may appear to meet WP:NSPORT, he does not meet the the more-fundamental requirements of WP:GNG. KDS 4444 Talk  09:03, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:19, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

*Keep - Sources indicate that the individual has played in a fully professional league and so passes WP:NFOOTY. Article needs expanding not deleting. Per current consensus, players who have played in a fully professional league are assumed notable. Presence or lack thereof on Serbian WP or any other Wiki is not relevant. Fenix down (talk) 11:43, 30 June 2014 (UTC) Anctually not sure he has played FPL. Fenix down (talk) 11:52, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - numerous appearances in a fully-professional league, as confirmed by reliable sources, so this player meets WP:NFOOTBALL. Needs improving, not deleting, to bring in line with WP:GNG. Nomination smacks of WP:POINT. GiantSnowman 17:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - It was my understanding that the policies outlined in WP:NFOOTY and WP:NFOOTBALL, both under the heading of WP:NSPORTS, were only intended as useful guidelines, rules of thumb, and that WP:GNG still had to be met to justify a full article. As a relatively recent creation, this article maybe needs more time.  I am wondering, though, if it does not maybe fall into a class of articles (WP:SUBSTUBS on young footballers/ soccer players) whose good faith creation was premised on a misinterpretation of WP:NSPORTS (?). Or maybe I am the one who is misinterpreting-- in that case, please help!   KDS 4444  Talk  22:01, 30 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep There does seem to be a lack of ANY information on the Internet I can find to confirm that this 36-year old footballer actually exists. Are we sure this isn't an error? Perhaps User:Lotom could provide further information? . Ah, here's a source ... there was an error in my search. Meets WP:NFOOTY then, so it's a keep. Edit, I note that game happens to be a friendly ... so here's a different source for a recent league appearance  Nfitz (talk) 18:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - Ristić has played in the fully-pro SuperLiga and appears to be the subject of significant coverage in online Serbian-language sources from recent years. It is difficult for me to find online sources from prior to 2012 - which would represent the majority of his career - and there is another person with the same name who is well-known as a political appointee. That said, I was able to slighly expand the article and add a few sources I found. Nfitz mentions a few others, and I'm confident this article will meet GNG with help from someone proficient in Serbian (especially if they have access to offline sources). Jogurney (talk) 15:44, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.