Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deletion (4th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools' day is over (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk &#x2022;&#x20;Contributions &#x2022;&#x20;Email) 00:44, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Deletion

 * – ( View AfD View log )

As I read today's nominations, I reminded myself: why do these things exist? It would be easier for us all if we just deleted the concept of deletion altogether so we no longer have to get into heated debates over whether to keep an article just because it's not "notable" or whatever. -B RAINULATOR 9 (TALK) 22:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep deleting deletion would create a paradox where since Deletion is deleted, it can't be deleted. thus, no point to do so &#128156; melecie   talk  - 23:56, 1 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.