Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delfino v. Moore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. –  Rob e  rt  00:42, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Delfino v. Moore
An anon suggested deleting this, I agree. No precedent ever established. Just a superior court case.

N.B. 6 months ago, creator of article (who is the plaintiff) went on a wide vandalism spree, sneaking his non-significant case into 100+ Wikipedia legal articles.

delete

Lotsofissues 21:03, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Non-notable legal case. Durova 00:10, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a legal journal. Stifle 21:10, 9 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete completely uninteresting and no relevance or precedent.  If author did indeed vandalize 100+ articles then all of these articles should be reverted as well.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.