Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delhi School of Excellence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:08, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Delhi School of Excellence

 * – ( View AfD View log )

School does not appear to pass WP:NORG, I cannot find any sources and the article does not currently show notability Garnarblarnar (talk) 08:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 December 11.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 08:38, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Engr.  Smitty   Werben 08:44, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Engr.  Smitty   Werben 08:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Engr.  Smitty   Werben 08:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. A school entitled "School of Excellence" definitely sounds too promotional to be real, let alone notable. Ajf773 (talk) 10:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Huzaifa abedeen (talk) 04:37, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete There are no claims in the article that would meet WP:NSCHOOL google is not showing anything that would support NotabilityJeepday (talk) 00:20, 17 December 2020 (UTC).
 * Delete. Schools don't have inherent notability.  This is a random private grade school and there's no evidence it's notable.  FalconK (talk) 04:31, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOL / (WP:ORGCRIT), lacks WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV that address the subject directly and in-depth. There is basic, run of the mill, routine, normal, coverage. SIngle source in the article is not IS RS with SIGCOV and BEFORE revealed nothing with SIGCOV. The article makes no claim towards meeting WP:N and BEFORE revealed none. This is a normal school, not an encyclopedic topic.  // Timothy ::  talk  08:22, 17 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.