Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delilah (The Dresden Dolls song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Yes, Virginia.... It looks like the discussion agrees to fall back to a redirect slakr  \ talk / 06:05, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Delilah (The Dresden Dolls song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Gives no indication of its notability and does not appear to be deserving of its own article. Lachlan Foley (talk) 01:30, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  01:34, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:30, 9 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Comment At worst, redirect to Yes, Virginia... rather than delete. Boleyn (talk) 19:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Agreed with comment WP:SONGS supports redirecting to the containing album: "Most songs ... should redirect to another relevant article, such as ... a prominent album ...". So I agree, that "at worst, redirect to Yes, Virginia... rather than delete." — Lentower (talk) 00:16, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep for now. In the limited time I have had in the last few days, I have not found any great WP quality sources for this song, Delilah. But in the interviews and reviews I have read about this song and the album it's on, this song is mentioned most frequently. I added one source.  I also added notability seeking others to wok on this article. Further research should find better sources. There are also several print sources, not on the Internet, that can be checked. They will take a while to track down. — Lentower (talk) 00:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:34, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above. Absolutely no sources to support a claim of independent notability. Neutralitytalk 04:03, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.