Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delilah Jay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Delilah Jay

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

PROD removed by article creator, no reason given. Fails WP:GNG, no evidence of notability, article seems to be promotional. GiantSnowman 09:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep the reason for removing PROD *was* explained in edit summary. 2 more links for notability added. First author to use means of abduction to promote book. And eurovision plus upcoming mayoral campaign. Benjamin moores (talk) 11:29, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  sst ✈  07:20, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  sst ✈  07:20, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:34, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:34, 4 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as my searches frankly found nothing better but draft and userfy if needed. SwisterTwister   talk  06:45, 7 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete – Not finding any significant coverage, nor any reviews of her works in reliable sources. Does not meet WP:BASIC or WP:AUTHOR. North America1000 09:35, 7 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Known in germany, italy and london. Literary circles and west london culture. Jim Halperin-Kim (talk) 15:06, 7 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.