Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delilah Jay (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 04:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Delilah Jay
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

From source searches, does not appear to meet WP:BASIC, WP:NAUTHOR, WP:MUSICBIO or WP:NPOL. Sources in the article are unreliable except for the Radio Times article, which does not mention the subject, and source searches are mostly providing tabloid, WP:BLP1E-style coverage about the subject wading into a fountain. The first AfD discussion back in late December 2015–early January 2016 was closed as no consensus. North America1000 09:31, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:31, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:32, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:32, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:32, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)


 * delete she made a bit of a splash by wading into the Trevi Fountain, but after dismissing this as mere WP:SENSATION, there is nothing left.  Searches turn up lots of online self-promotion, but nothing in the way or RS that support notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. As written, this literally just asserts that she exists, and fails to claim anything that would even be quantifiable in terms of whether it passed our inclusion criteria or not. It says, frex, that she's a singer-songwriter and a politician, but contains no content about her ever writing a song or undertaking any political activity to substantiate those career claims — and Come Dine with Me is not a show that can hand everybody who ever won it an automatic inclusion freebie, either, because every episode has its own individual winner. If she could be sourced over WP:GNG for her writing, or for the claimed music or politics, then things might be different — but nothing claimed or sourced here gives her passage of any notability criterion as things stand today, so even the Trevi Fountain coverage blip would just make her a WP:BLP1E. Bearcat (talk) 19:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and not notable as a Politician ,Musician or Author failing WP:NAUTHOR ,WP:POLITICIAN and WP:MUSICBIO.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:55, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- non notable author; not enough sources to suggest notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:22, 6 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.