Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delk News Quarterly

Friends, we have a Wikipedia first: A vanity disambiguation page! An article on Roger Delk was listed as a copyvio, another article on Delk which should be speedied is a disambiguation page to the Roger Delk article and this article...which also mentions Roger Delk. Confusing, but true. - Lucky 6.9 18:45, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * I think I shall print this one out and have it framed. After that, feel free to delete. Ianb 18:59, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: I warned you all.  Once the genealogists find a place, they fill all voids.  Private, non-notable, website. Geogre 19:04, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete 'em all. In fact, I'm going to use the term 'delk' to mean just that! - UtherSRG 19:26, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete all three - (However, Delk is not a speedy delete candidate.) - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  21:45, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Delk all three! So Roger Delk is just "some guy" from the 17th century? - Eisnel 06:30, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. However, Roger Delk may be marginally significant since he was elected to the House of Burgesses.  A link to the Delk News Quartlerly [] would then be a suitable external link for that article. If the Roger Delk article was created as vanity, and contributor understands the GFDL, then Roger Delk should stay, albeit with cleanup. Dunc_Harris|&#9786; 20:52, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)