Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delma Kollar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Salvio Let's talk about it! 01:19, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Delma Kollar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not significant. WP:BIO1E. Sources include a dead link and a duplicate article, which leaves 2 articles on the same website, which is not enough to pass WP:SIGCOV. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  21:28, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:59, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:50, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:50, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:51, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:51, 21 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete This article fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO1E because there is only sparse WP:ROUTINE local coverage of her. There is no guideline that "the fourth oldest x" is notable either. The article is also filled with the typical longevity trivia (born, married, had kids, worked, and died) which is not needed. The encyclopedic information in this article, her age, life dates, and nationality is already recorded in a table on the List of supercentenarians from the United States, where it is easier to view without the fancruft in the way. Newshunter12 (talk) 08:56, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge per WP:NOPAGE. EEng 17:39, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete just living a long time does not make someone notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:31, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect to appropriate list per WP:NOPAGE. Wasn't the oldest in her country or the world and this article is never going to expand beyond a WP:PERMASTUB of born, married twice, had kids, worked and died. CommanderLinx (talk) 11:36, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of the type of coverage that would be sufficient to meet WP:N. There's nothing here of encyclopedic value that couldn't be reproduced effectively on one of the many longevity-related lists on Wikipedia. Canadian   Paul  21:30, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Not Notable. Into the Rift (talk) 12:20, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Meh probably only of local interest. A search for additional sources found was a drive-by mention in Guinness, a short bio at , which I think is derivative, and a rather lengthy piece at the Salem Statesman Journal (November 1, 2010 page 4C)  which comes closest to establishing notability.   78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 19:23, 28 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.