Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delphia Yachts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Wily D 08:16, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Delphia Yachts

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

The largest company of a given type in country A is not enough to make it notable. See Notability (companies). Poorly referenced, basically a sub-stub company entry. We are not a business directory. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 16:54, 29 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep because this topic clearly passes WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. Source examples include:
 * Delphia Yachts Kot: Żeglarska marka światowa | rp.pl
 * Warsaw Business Journal - Online Portal - wbj.pl
 * Delphia Yachts slow down | Nowy Puls Biznesu - rynek, akcje, spółka, przedsiębiorca, budżet
 * Sailing into the sunset - Shipping & Marine Magazine
 * Also, per WP:NRVE, topic notability is based upon the availability of significant coverage in reliable sources, rather than whether or not sources are present in articles. See also WP:IMPERFECT and WP:PRESERVE. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:58, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per the sources found by Northamerica1000. Regardless of my opinion of editing policies being cited in deletion discussions, he makes a convincing case for notability. Beyond the availability vs presence issue, remember also that sources do not have to be in English. - The Bushranger One ping only 07:23, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 07:23, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.