Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delphic of gamma sigma tau fraternity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 11:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Delphic of gamma sigma tau fraternity
Doesn't pass WP:N.  Cool Blue  Light my Fire! 18:45, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Regional fraternity with only one active chapter. Not-notable enough for a student organization. Caknuck 19:45, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Other articles that relate to this I found: Gamma Sigma Tau and Delphic Fraternity, which all seem to be about the same thing as this AfD. (I have no opinion yet on the notability of this topic) - grubber 15:03, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * delete per nomOo7565 20:50, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment this article was nominated for deletion within 10 seconds of its creation. At the very least keep for the full five days to allow time to expand -  irides centi   (talk to me!)  19:40, 21 April 2007 (UTC)


 * &emsp; Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  &emsp; Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 12:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Giving the article itself time to expand means nothing if it's not notable in the first place. — Pious7Talk Contribs 16:15, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Pious7's point, because not notable. Seems to be a commented linklist only. --Gwyndon 18:58, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Iridescenti had a great point in that there needed to be time for expansion, but it has now been a week since the article's creation.  Beyond the creation and the AfD, there is no other activity in the article's history.  Article is not notable in its current state, and if nobody has improved it in the week since the nomination, it's probably not going to be further improved. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 19:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - this has had almost 10 days now and no sign of anyone adding to it, and I don't think anyone not connected to it would be able to expand it -  irides centi   (talk to me!)  08:16, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing will come of this article. Jmlk17 21:18, 23 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.