Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delphix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 12:04, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Delphix

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability. Blogs and press releases. Somehow, this looks very familiar. Dennis Brown (talk) 17:00, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Promotional tone ("provides ... solutions"); no independent reliable sources.AndrewWTaylor (talk) 17:06, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * extremely weak keep Im generally a deletionist, but this does have the zdnet and venturebeat refs, minimally qualifies as notable imo. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:16, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I noticed those as well, but it was in ZDNet's blog area, written by someone who works at Interarbor Solutions rather than a journalist/editor. I guess I'm not as sold on Venture Beat's article (or site). That isn't an article it is just a mention in a paragraph, which (imo) falls short of significant coverage, with no editorial content whatsoever.  Dennis Brown (talk) 17:37, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * the red orbit one is decent, not sure if the source qualifies or not though. In any case, I would not put up a fight if it goes away, just thought it deserved a mention in the discussion at least. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:47, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Reminds me of quite a few promotional articles we see, albeit with brief mentions in a few reliable sources. Still not quite enough there in what I could find. Nwlaw63 (talk) 20:54, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 03:17, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 03:17, 10 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. For businesses, notability is not about counting press mentions, nor could it be, given the existence of publicity firms whose task is to get a business noticed, and sometimes succeed. Instead, it's about having significant effects on history, technology, or culture that give an individual firm lasting significance in the development of its trade. I don't see that here. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.