Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta 8 (brand)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 03:54, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Delta 8 (brand)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Of the three sources, two don't mention this company specifically and the first is a puff-piece interview. Does not meet GNG. Written by a SPA, probably COI, and is a declined AFC. May even qualify for G11 CSD. MB 02:53, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. MB 02:53, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MB 02:53, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Hulatam (talk) 06:37, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I don't want to soft-delete on the basis that it will likely be contested at some point, so relisting to establish clear consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 19:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - completely WP:PROMO, but has received recent coverage in the NYT and NYP. SailingInABathTub (talk) 20:24, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. I rejected this one at AFC. It's a tricky one to verify and do WP:BEFORE on because Delta-8 is both a chemical (of which there is sigcov) and a brand (of which there does not appear to be sigcov). This particular article is just about the brand. The three sources in the article I evaluate as follows: #1 is an interview so not independent. #2 I didn't evaluate yet, but am willing to evaluate if somebody quotes the line where Delta 8 the brand is mentioned. #3 does not appear to mention delta 8, therefore not significant coverage. The two sources in the comment above I evaluate as follows: #1 The NYT article doesn't mention the brand at all, only the chemical, so no significant coverage of the brand. #2 The New York Post is not a reliable source, per WP:RSPSOURCES. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. – Novem Linguae (talk) 13:29, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom, and the analysis by . SailingInABathTub (talk) 20:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete-per Novem Linguae.-KH-1 (talk) 23:28, 13 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.