Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Air Lines Flight 1063


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. joe deckertalk to me 23:52, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Delta Air Lines Flight 1063

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

NOT Notable per WP:AIRCRASH, WP:NOTNEWS and too much WP:RECENTISM ...William 01:09, 21 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions....William 01:12, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions....William 01:12, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions....William 01:12, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions....William 01:12, 21 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Completely routine, not remotely notable.Not even newsworthy, really. See avherald.com, for examples of how this sort of thing is extremely common and routine. Skrelk (talk) 14:20, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. "An aircraft took off, ate a few birds, safely landed. In other news, a man completed the Monster Cheeseburger challenge at MJ's Greasy Spoon." Both events rise to about the same level of notability with regards to Wikipedia, which is to say, none whatsoever. - The Bushranger One ping only 01:37, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete because WP has enough articles per nom. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 03:52, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Damage to a single engine is usually not an incident that puts an airliner in all that much danger. Coverage is likely to be transient only for an event like this. Sjakkalle (Check!)  06:38, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Plea. Please, please, please, do not attack the author with comments like "Very poor understanding of the criteria for inclusion by the creator of the article", and "Why did the author bother with this. I wonder." Neither of those votes addresses the notability of the article, instead it bites at the author who is a newcomer trying to contribute to Wikipedia in good faith. Knowledge of the inclusion and notability guidelines is gained by experience, and almost everyone here have made errors in judgement in this area. Sjakkalle (Check!)  13:44, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Added welcome template to user talk page to help. --Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 23:13, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Definitely not notable, accidents like this happen very frequently indeed.-- Mark91  it's my world   10:50, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Snow Delete per William, The Bushranger and Mark91. Thee is nothing further to add. YSSYguy (talk) 13:44, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Very poor understanding of the criteria for inclusion by the creator of the article.--Jetstreamer Talk 14:58, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Obvious Delete A Germanwings airplane I was flying in in 2006 hit some birds on the way to Germany. I see no Wikipedia article about it. Same applies for this airplane. Osarius     Talk 15:07, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. An aeroplane hitting a few birds but suffering no damage doesn't seem a particularly noteworthy event to me. J I P  &#124; Talk 16:05, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Why did the author bother with this. I wonder?Petebutt (talk) 23:50, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I tried to avoid AFDing this article by making it a redirect via WP:BOLD but the article's creator reverted. So I had no other choice but Afd it. We have ten editors who agree with my nomination and not one single dissenter. Isn't it time for WP:SNOWBALL to be proclaimed and this discussion be closed?...William 13:14, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I was riding in a packed school bus many years ago, when the driver became violently ill and began vomiting. In those pre-cell phone days, it took hours to sort things out, several athletic contests were cancelled and couldn't be rescheduled, and the outcome of at least one state championship was probably affected. It therefore was a more notable event than this, and I am prepared to write an article about it, which strike fear and dismay into the hearts of any editors considering keep !votes. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 01:49, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete minor accident that fails WP:AIRCRASH. I suggest a WP:SNOW closure. B  music  ian  14:24, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No one died, it only lost one engine, and it landed just fine in an airport. Fails WP:AIRCRASH. - Jorgath (talk) (contribs) 17:51, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable as far as I can see. Pretty much a WP:SNOW and clear consensus right here. --Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 23:06, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.