Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Air Lines Flight 520


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ per WP:SNOW. Bishonen &#124; tålk 08:31, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Delta Air Lines Flight 520

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The definition of WP:NOTNEWS. Losing an inflatable slide mid-flight isn't something that's gonna get sustained coverage, and I know (not "I don't think", I know) it's gonna fail the ten-year test.  Liliana UwU  (talk / contributions) 04:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * why not request speed delete if you mr. einstein think you know (not "i don't think", i know) that this will 100% fail that nonsense test? like those random plane crash articles from the 90's that would definitely fail that 10 year test?? GeekyAviation (talk) 05:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete - Per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:LASTING. The aircraft involved is 33 years old, this isn’t a brand new aircraft that was recently delivered. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 05:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - No fatalities or serious injuries, only minor damage to the airframe, and unlikely to result in changes to procedures, regulations or processes affecting airports, airlines or the aircraft industry. I agree that this is unlikely to pass WP:10YT.  Maybe this incident will maintain some traction with sensationalist sources due to a Boeing aircraft being involved, but I fully expect all reliable sources to stop covering this story long before it would be considered lasting coverage. -  ZLEA  T \ C 05:38, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - agree with everything above. If this does attract continued coverage (as unlikely as that seems) then it can be resurrected.--Gronk Oz (talk) 09:47, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - Incident seems unnotable. No fatalities, no injuries, just like any other minor incident. Also WP:NOTNEWS CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 13:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and New York.
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  15:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete run-of-the-mill incident, per WP:NOTNEWS. Rosbif73 (talk) 16:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * i remember when you called LATAM Airlines Flight 800 a non notable incident aswell, of course you call this a run-of-the-mill incident GeekyAviation (talk) 02:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOTNEWS Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 20:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * seems like you are going along with everyone else and seem to not know anything about aviation, funny GeekyAviation (talk) 02:51, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Your comments are becoming disruptive. If you have legitimate rebuttals to specific arguments, then you can voice them here.  Otherwise, please let this discussion run its course. -  ZLEA  T \ C 03:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * "then you can voice them here." thats literally what im doing GeekyAviation (talk) 03:23, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You should actually state what’s wrong with their statements while providing clear reasons why you don’t agree whilst being respectful instead of criticizing them just because you have a different opinion. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 03:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * do i look like im deleting peoples votes and not letting the discussion run? nope GeekyAviation (talk) 03:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Comment - I have opened an SPI case into GeekyAviation. Liliana has also opened an ANI discussion regarding Geeky's rude comments. -  ZLEA  T \ C 03:48, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * And it seems they were blocked just as I was typing this. - ZLEA  T \ C 03:49, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable minor aircraft incident, WP:NOTNEWS. – dudhhr talkcontribssheher 05:41, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.