Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Pi Rho


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 13:29, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Delta Pi Rho

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable fraternity, advertising/promotional tone of article, no independent sources for notability found. Declined speedy and also likely conflict of interest article creation by User:DPRVig. Also, if the result is delete, the user subpage User:DPRVig/DPR should be deleted as well (copy of the article). Cquan (after the beep...) 04:15, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete--same reason as the Delta Phi Mu AfD review, above. Drmies (talk) 05:42, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep--Considering we are a young and small chapter, I am quite aware of the fact that we are relatively unknown right now. That is actually a reason as to why I decided to make a Wikipedia article for us; to help get our name out.  I don't see how anything I have written is all that advertising, as I have only written down facts.  I would understand that argument better if I bad mouthed any other organizations or talked about how great I think we are.  The fact is, as a small organization, we have few outlets where we can have people read about us.  Also, note that I am the historian of my organization, so this does fall under my duties.DPRVig DPRVig (talk) 06:18, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - No notability established. Pyrrhus16 (talk) 11:22, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and per article's author above: "The fact is, as a small organization, we have few outlets where we can have people read about us." Toddst1 (talk) 16:06, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   —• Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Toddst1. THF (talk) 18:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:ORG. TerriersFan (talk) 01:34, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ORG. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 06:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No substantive, independent reliable sources to be found. Fails WP:ORG. Deor (talk) 16:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.