Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Psi Delta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 03:43, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Delta Psi Delta

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A DAB page where none of the listing have articles. No incoming links GrapedApe (talk) 18:44, 4 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete A DAB page where none of the listing have articles. North8000 (talk) 19:23, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Keeping to mind that there may be evidence to support an article or two, I searched Google News archives but found nothing useful for Wikipedia. I found news articles here (Delta Psi Delta departs from sorority relations group) and here (sorority hopes to become nationally known). While continuing my search, I found this news article that confirms the existence of the Chico club for Delta Psi Delta. Expecting to find something with Google Books, I searched but found nothing useful. SwisterTwister   talk  19:49, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep, MOS:DABMENTION. I took out the entries that did not mention Delta Psi Delta, but the others are valid dab entries. -- JHunterJ (talk) 16:05, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, items don't have to be article names, the term is correctly mentioned in articles per MOS:DABMENTION, three entries are enough per WP:MOSDAB - this is a valid DAB page, per JHunterJ. Widefox ; talk 11:46, 9 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per JHunterJ. Having no incoming links is irrelevant; disambiguation pages shouldn't have incoming links. &#0032;⋘HueSatLum ?&thinsp;❢⋙ 22:41, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per what JHunterJ stated and HueSatLum. Incoming links is not required. -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  00:15, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.