Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deluxe Marina FC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ffm is now L Faraone  22:35, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Deluxe Marina FC

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

I was unable to find any evidence that this club exists from a Google search. I tried including the manager's name (Joleon O'Connor) - still nothing. If you can't find any supporting information at all, the article may not stay. Chutznik (talk) 17:54, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. Polarpanda (talk) 20:50, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. GiantSnowman 22:09, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I also can't find evidence for this team existing; even if it does, it has not played at a high enough level to be considered notable in footballing terms. GiantSnowman 22:11, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Much like GiantSnowman and the nom, I can't find any evidence of this team existing. I don't know what the notability level for the Channel Islands is (since we don't have Football in Guernsey, Football in Jersey or Football in the Channel Islands - I'm assuming that they're referring to the ones in the English Channel), but I doubt this team meets it. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  23:02, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I too smell a hoax, and that goes for the Channel Islands Premier League, which this team has supposedly won in the past - I can't find any evidence of that league existing nor any of its teams. As far as I know, there is no such thing as a league spanning the whole of the Channel Islands, just separate leagues for Jersey and Guernsey. In fact, I'm going to go ahead and prod that league article.  Bettia  (talk)  10:14, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Potential hoaxes need eyes to confirm them. With prodding the amount of checks is minimal. I would prefer it if the other article is included in this nomination instead. - Mgm|(talk) 13:19, 15 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - As probable hoax Spiderone  18:46, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Hoax, alot of effort but still a hoax.--Egghead06 (talk) 09:39, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - complete lack of independent reliable sources sufficient to establish notability. MikeWazowski (talk) 05:03, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.