Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delver Social Search


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 03:31, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Delver Social Search

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article describes a currently non-notable social search engine. Of the two references, one doesn't mention the company at all, and one only does in comments to a blog entry. "Social Search" may be notable, but this particular social search engine is not--yet, at least, and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Bongo matic  03:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:17, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - cute little site. I bookmarked it, but 'tis lacking in notability. Also, I agree with the crystal ball thingy. X MarX the Spot (talk) 04:21, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Not Delete - See 32,000 Google search results. I've added a few external sources from large technology sites. Ripper234 (talk) 09:25, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:58, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Not Delete - added another recent mention. Was going to add Delver to list of social search engines when this delete thing started, compare to others on that list --Alteregoz (talk) 09:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Not Delete - Uriash (talk) 13:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Not Delete - 212.235.23.232 (talk) 15:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * — 212.235.23.232 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Please provide a reason. This is not a majority vote, but a discussion in which to establish consensus on whether this should be deleted or not. Providing no reason helps nothing in this discussion. MuZemike  ( talk ) 17:05, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - despite the obvious single purpose voters, the techcrunch article & others establish notability the usual way. No need to be petty, just follow the usual standards. Wily D  15:41, 11 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.