Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delview Secondary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 09:58, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Delview Secondary School

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article does not establish its' notability. Could not find any additional info. Thank you for your time.  Matthew  Yeager  09:40, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ORG. one trivial mention in a Google news search. Michellecrisp (talk) 10:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep We have wide-ranging precedent for the keeping of US high schools as inherently notable; as this seems to be a similar type of school, why should we treat Canadian schools any differently? Nyttend (talk) 13:26, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep High schools are traditionally kept through long-standing precedent. Quite a lot of google hits, many independent - hard to decide on the notability of each one, though.  Overall clearly notable, though. Wily D  13:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - sufficient sources are available to meet WP:N. High school articles should be expanded and not deleted. TerriersFan (talk) 18:13, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep we normally keep high schools, and I think that is a good idea. Article looks good.--Paul McDonald (talk) 20:44, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment high schools like any organisation must pass WP:ORG. WP:ILIKEIT is not a reason to keep. Secondly, the citations don't really establish notability of this school. A school upgrade does not satisfy WP:GNG. Michellecrisp (talk) 04:51, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   —TerriersFan (talk) 22:55, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as High schools mostly kept per WP:OUTCOMES. The article in Vancouver Sun establishes WP:N and school is WP:V so I see this well referenced article as a keeper.--Sting   Buzz Me...   23:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, per long-established precedent and the availability of citable sources. --Gene_poole (talk) 19:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.