Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delvin Pinheiro Frederico


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Botched understanding of OTRS-ticket.And, it's snowing. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades Godric  08:48, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Delvin Pinheiro Frederico

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject has requested to delete this BLP via OTRS. The subject claims he created this page himself which is apparently true given that the page contains OR and not many RS. I'm not sure if he meets GNG therefore nominating this for deletion.. Saqib (talk) 14:14, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Misleading statement removed. -- QEDK ( 後  &#127800;  桜 ) 08:33, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 16:11, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 16:11, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 16:11, 10 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment - He played 14 minutes at fully professional level yesterday, so the article barely passes WP:NFOOTY. I'm not sure soccer notability guidelines were intended to keep articles like this one. It requires a major re-write to pass WP:BLP and MOS:PUFF. If edited to WP:V (and, by implication, WP:BLP and MOS:PUFF), then technically it passes the subject-specific guideline. Jack N. Stock (talk) 17:36, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment an article with in-depth coverage of him --Lerdsuwa (talk) 17:57, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * An article that describes him as "a beautiful flower." Maybe it loses something in machine translation. And the source of the information in the article is his mother. That does not help establish WP:GNG, and I wouldn't cite it in the article except to support a second source that is independent of the subject. Jack N. Stock (talk) 20:21, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Regarding to the "a beautiful flower", it's just language difference. Equivalent in English would be "a budding superstar" or similar. I found only one quote that is from his mother, not the entire article. --Lerdsuwa (talk) 06:50, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:NFOOTY as he's played in a fully professional league (Thai Premier League), again in a 14-minute stint. Definitely agree it needs WP:TNT: maybe delete anything unsourced? Also, no evidence of him playing 11 games for Buriram. SportingFlyer  talk  01:42, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Just went through the entire article: while the subject passes WP:NFOOTY, it's possible almost everything needs to be deleted and rewritten. SportingFlyer  talk  01:45, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:41, 11 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep - now, technically, just, meets WP:NFOOTBALL. Need massive clean-up and improvement. GiantSnowman 09:10, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes NFOOTY, has played senior international football, in a fully professional league or in a match in the competition proper (i.e. not qualifying rounds) of a cup competition which involved two teams both from FPLs. Agree with the comments above though that the article needs a major rework in terms of tone. Fenix down (talk) 09:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:NFOOTY per the above. AfD is not cleanup. Smartyllama (talk) 14:54, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree, AfD is not cleanup and our decisions need to be based on notability guidelines. WP:V can be addressed with the assumption that reliable sources will be available for someone who passes WP:NFOOTY. Jack N. Stock (talk) 15:13, 13 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.