Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demario Richard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:43, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Demario Richard

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Multiple issues here, but lets start with this article failing WP:Athlete. It also reads like a press release, and doesn't have any independent sourcing. AniMate 13:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:42, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:42, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. This article is in truly god-awful shape and desperately needs a rewrite.  However, Demario Richard actually meets WP:GNG.  He plays running back for a Power Five program and rushed for 1104 yards in 2015.  A quick google search does turn a fair amount of significant coverage of the type required under GNG, e.g., (1) here, (2) here, (3) here, (4) here, (5) here, (6) here, (7) here, and (8) here. Cbl62 (talk) 22:52, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I cleaned it up a bit to get rid of some of the most egregious stuff. Cbl62 (talk) 19:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep per Cbl62. A running back for a major college football team. Meets GNG. Natg 19 (talk) 01:04, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.