Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demet Mutlu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 03:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Demet Mutlu

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Resume-like BLP of businesswoman with mostly awards and speaking engagements.--Canyonpass (talk) 15:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone  17:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone  17:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone  17:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete nothing here actually rises to a claim of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:19, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The article has major problems, but the subject is actually notable in my opinion. She is the founder and CEO of Trendyol, which is "the largest e-commerce platform in Turkey". According to this article by Anadolu Agency, the company created 1.1 million jobs in Turkey in 2020 alone. Keivan.f  Talk 05:37, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep JPL is just speedrunning delete votes at this point and I doubt that he tries to search additional sources. I’ve added some sources where citation was needed. The following sources are RS:, , , , , , . I think this person meets WP:GNG. ~Styyx   Talk? ^-^  08:32, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep As per Keivan. Setreis (talk) 20:17, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Of those listed examples only Bloomberg really qualifies as an RS. Half of them don't even have an author.--Canyonpass (talk) 17:32, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm not sure whether this is notable and I try to stay out of marginal cases where most sources are likely to be in a language I don't speak. But I wanted to chime in to rebut a bad argument. Notability is not inherited; no matter how large or important the company someone may have founded, for a biographical article they need to personally be the focus of independent coverage in reliable secondary sources. FalconK (talk) 06:15, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 04:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Bloomberg, World Economic Forum and Fortune Turkey are all good secondary sources. Passes WP:GNG. CAVETOWNFAN (talk) 14:04, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, for the reasons of those who want this article kept. Davidgoodheart (talk) 14:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - per good secondary sources. Per WP:GNG. BabbaQ (talk) 18:53, 25 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.