Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demetrius "Hook" Mitchell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:18, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Demetrius "Hook" Mitchell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NBASKETBALL Joeykai (talk) 13:55, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: Passes WP:GNG as there are multiple, reliable, independent sources about him, as well as others mentioning him. He seems to have been notable enough to have a documentary made about his life, as well as a few independent articles. crh23 (talk) 14:05, 4 April 2016 (UTC), Edited 19:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Dragon  14:51, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Dragon  14:51, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Dragon  14:51, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Dragon  14:51, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Passes GNG with substantial coverage over a period of years in the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, San Francisco Chronicle, two documentaries and associated coverage. --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:10, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:56, 12 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep Seems notable enough, meets WP:BASKETBALL ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 12:08, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Actually he does not meet WP:NBASKETBALL. This AfD will need to stand or fall on GNG. Rikster2 (talk) 12:15, 13 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep as I planned to comment earlier and this is convincing enough. SwisterTwister   talk  04:08, 20 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.