Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democracy (word)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Sango 123  03:09, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Democracy (word)
WP:NOT (dictionary term) and generally unencyclopedic, not to mention free of almost any useful content. David Oberst 05:30, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - per my nom. If this falls into any sort of speedy category as a dictionary entry I'd also endorse that, should an admin do so. - David Oberst
 * Strong delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and even if it were, this is very redundant in light of Democracy.  I wouldn't mind a speedy either, but I don't see a WP:CSD that fits. -David Schaich Talk/Cont 06:01, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. You might be able to argue A1, but I'm not going to try. tmopkisn tlka 06:25, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, but NOT speedy, why would we need that for an article that existed like this for over a year and is not disruptive in any way? Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 12:18, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT a dictionary.--Isotope23 13:13, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Week delete - The article kind of had a point in its existence until a year ago when the list of parties with the word democratic in the title was removed. There may be a week case for putting it back in, but otherwise delete. --BobFromBrockley 14:41, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.