Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democrat Republic Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:01, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Democrat Republic Party

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be WP:HOAX, created by now blocked user. No refs, google search on the party name in Albanian or the name of the supposed leader gives no result. Soman (talk) 14:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages due to same concerns (see also Articles for deletion/Independent Party (Kosovo)):

--Soman (talk) 14:27, 4 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. All five of these parties appear to be long-lived hoaxes, with no references for their names or supposed leaders. Even in a foreign language, it's inconceivable that an individual leading a serious political party in Europe would not have multiple independent Google hits. 66.177.64.39 (talk) 21:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kosovo-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:45, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete all per 66, no coverage on Google Books or anywhere except Wikipedia mirrors. Everymorning   talk  15:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. At best, they fail the GNG. At worst, hoaxes. I'm leaning towards hoax. bobrayner (talk) 00:52, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nomination statement and all comments above. They are all either original research or a blatant hoax. Either way, they're clearly non-notable.--NextUSprez (talk) 19:05, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.