Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demographics and culture of Bhat (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:03, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Demographics and culture of Bhat
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:54, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Bringing it here for a community decision, as I've had some disagreements with another editor about it. As poorly sourced as most village articles, but should at least be mergeable.  DGG ( talk ) 11:48, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The other editor seems to be removing extensive  content and sources after the afd was placed, which does not seem the way for a fair community discussion. I have restored it, but if anyone looks and sees a one-sentence article, look in the history.   DGG ( talk ) 11:56, 28 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Snow delete Not encyclopedic at all. First point is this is so small village besides Ahmedabad and has population of 5000. The creator made articles on small features of their villages and all of them are being nominated for delete by me.
 * Second thing, first reference is primary but that should not be problem. Main problem is second and third source. Second source is for Karnataka which is 2000 Kms far from this place and another source is Tarla Dalal's book. Second book is book for recipes, had NO MENTION of village or food of village in it.
 * Third thing, this is whole encyclopedic. What the legend of Krishna birth has to do with demographics of culture?
 * Fourth thing, it is dangerous OR and fails WP:V. Noone knows that Sindhis and Marwaris are living there and vegetarianism is being practised there. This violates basic policy of verifiability.
 * Fifth thing, I can challenge the community that they can't even find more than one para about village. I am living near this locality and this is just small village like other villages. If this article will stand then tomorrow some people will demand separate article for each and every village. Definitely, creator was WP:NOTHERE to built encyclopedia but to promote his village on the platform by making some silly articles.
 * Delete this ASAP to save the time of community.-- Harshil want to talk? 16:05, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting - removing significant content under the guise of "silly", when those are claims of notability, will potentially hinder the quest for WP:V and WP:N.
 * Upmerge anything that's adequately sourced to Bhat, Daskroi. Guettarda (talk) 21:52, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 15:29, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. The demographics info is the only worthwhile, sourced content, and that's already in the main article. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:03, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge into the main article. This town is the size of a small borough in New Jersey or Pennsylvania, and tiny for a country of its size. There is zero need for it, and would confuse an ordinary user. Bearian (talk) 13:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.