Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demon Prince: Children of Gaia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 05:43, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Demon Prince: Children of Gaia
As per WP:Bk this is not a notable book as it has not won a major literary award, has not made a significant contribution to an art form, and has no historically significance. Also links provided are 1) from the makers website, 2) a copy/pasted press release from the maker, and 3) a self-produced online copy of the book: all questionable under WP:SPSWatkinsley (talk) 17:20, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

An IP tried to nominate this but didn't finish and once again, nobody cared. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:15, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Nope, they just couldn't move faster than you ;-) Watkinsley (talk) 17:23, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. ~ Amory (talk) 18:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:51, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.Theraggedyman (talk) 10:04, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.