Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demonic Toys (comic book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Demonic Toys. The Bushranger One ping only 00:28, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Demonic Toys (comic book)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Yet another comics article that floats around in its own in-universe bubble with no evidence whatsoever of 3rd party notability. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:31, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:37, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:50, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:00, 29 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge to Demonic Toys -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:47, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Demonic_Toys and merge pertinent data. I wish I had been able to find the sourcing to show notability for this spinoff as I'm a FM fan, but it just isn't out there. There are the various inevitable fan blog entries about this, but ultimately the reliable sourcing doesn't seem to exist. We can merge some of the information to the parent article and redirect to that section.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:37, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge to Demonic Toys, then redirect, per User:Tokyogirl79's rationale above. Makes sense. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:53, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to Demonic_Toys, appears the most reasonable solution here. Cavarrone (talk) 12:08, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.