Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demos and More


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 23:16, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Demos and More

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

unsourced demo Duffbeerforme (talk) 15:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep as "unsourced demo" is not a valid (or at least not well-explained) rationale for deletion. The album consists of demos, yes, but it was released as a physical album (I own it). WP:MUSIC allows for articles about demo albums if adequate sources exist. This was one of the first articles I created back in 2006, so I'll go back through it and look for sources. If no sources turn up, then I think it ought to be merged into the Agent 51 article under the discography section. --IllaZilla (talk) 20:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: unable to find anything of note on Google. Insufficient independent 3rd party coverage WP:NALBUMS. JamesBurns (talk) 08:42, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Userfy. Back in 2006 referencing standards were lower. I checked and IllaZilla appears to be a user in relative good standing. I'd be happy to give them some time to improve the referencing. - Mgm|(talk) 11:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  00:40, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Userfy or Delete, but certainly do not leave in place. Fails WP:V. Next up: the band article itself (Agent 51)? It's been unsourced for almost 2 years. Show me the sources! --AbsolutDan (talk) 01:21, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.