Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deneva Cagigas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Userfied to User:Hmlarson/Deneva Cagigas Drmies (talk) 17:42, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Deneva Cagigas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested Prod, however deletion rationale remains valid, namely: the player fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG.

A number of sources have been added to the article, but these are insufficient to satisfy GNG for the following reasons:


 * ligafemenil.mx - Website of the league her team plays in, primary source, not suitable for GNG
 * jornada.unam.mx - The newspaper of the university that owns the team she plays for, primary source, not suitable for GNG
 * jornada.unam.mx 2 - The newspaper of the university that owns the team she plays for, primary source, not suitable for GNG
 * marca.com This article is about the performance of her team. Although she is quoted it is about her team, not herself. There is little to nothing here that could be used to build an article on the player.
 * toquefiltrado.com - a brief article on the player. Contains some content suitable for an encyclopedic article but not enough on its own for GNG.
 * lospumasunam.com.mx - difficult to tell whether this is an official website of UNAM, her club, and therefore a primary source. Regardless, if it is not, I don't believe this is sufficiently independent per GNG to not be "affiliated" with the subject. Additionally, it is very brief.
 * laaficion.milenio.com - an article providing brief summaries of a number of players. Not significant coverage. Fenix down (talk) 13:19, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Fenix down (talk) 13:21, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions.  Matthew_hk   t  c  13:36, 19 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 13:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 13:57, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 13:57, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 13:57, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 13:57, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 13:57, 19 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete I do not see any evidence that the player passes WP:NFOOTBALL. Pinging Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 15:04, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Why did you ping me ? Did you have a question? Otherwise, it has the appearance of more unproductive behavior based on our last few interactions. I haven't seen you around until recently in women's football AFDs. Mostly just Fenix down and sometimes Giant Snowman. Hmlarson (talk) 20:09, 19 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Because You dePRODED this article, and I want to give you a chance. I think you have some suggestions about this AfD. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 03:47, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not pass the notability guidelines for footballers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:52, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Question - Can you advise why you are in such a rush to delete this article like Articles for deletion/Diana Evangelista? I'm seeing additional references that can be used via Google News to improve this article per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 00:32, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Hmlarson (talk) 00:54, 20 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Draft / Userfy  - I would like to work on expanding this article with content and additional secondary references but have limited time this week. Please move to Draft or Userfy. Hmlarson (talk) 18:45, 25 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.