Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denilson Hernanes Santos Sineiro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fenix down (talk) 19:35, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Denilson Hernanes Santos Sineiro

 * – ( View AfD View log )

If I get it correctly, the footballer has never player in a fully professional league, thereby failing WP:NFOOTY. I do not see correspondence to WP:GNG either. Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 22 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete does not meet our ludicrously broad inclusion criteria for football players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  19:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  19:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete lacks general notability. Thanks, EDG 543 (talk) 19:57, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Has played plenty of games in Serie C with Sampaio Corrêa which more than passes WP:NFOOTBALL threshold. Article seriously needs a cleanup. Govvy (talk) 20:25, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I can withdraw if all the votes are changed to keep.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:30, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets NFOOTBALL by some way. As Govvy says, needs improvement, not deleting. GiantSnowman 20:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep – per Govvy. Needs a ton of improvement, but not deletion. Keskkonnakaitse (talk) 16:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - Article about footballer who made a few appearances in Campeonato Brasileiro Série C (which creates a presumption of notability through NFOOTBALL) and which appears to be the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources (I added an in-depth article from Globo Esporte, and there is plenty of routine coverage, which overall suggests the GNG can be met). Needs some work of course. Jogurney (talk) 18:17, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Subject is far from meeting WP:NFOOTBALL. Although they play professionally, they never played in a competition better than Serie C, and Serie C is absolutely not notable per WP:NFOOTBALL, as it is lower tier than Serie B and Serie A. Even Serie B would arguably not be sufficient.  Walwal20  talk ▾ contribs 18:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * What are you talking about? Serie C is fully-pro on WP:FPL, which qualifies NFooty, Govvy (talk) 18:43, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , WP:NFOOTBALL merely indicates that list, it does not endorse it. What is professional or not is still up for discussion. Finally, WP:NFOOTBALL item 2 is a statement of presumption, not a guarantee. Best,  Walwal20  talk ▾ contribs 22:15, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Denilson also played twice in the 2006 Copa do Brasil as Bahia were eliminated by Ceilândia (both clubs were in the Brasileiro Série C at the time). I'm not sure when, but Série C has been added to the list of fully-pro leagues at WP:FPL. Jogurney (talk) 22:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - more than just a borderline NFOOTY pass Spiderone  23:01, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Does, in fact, meet NFOOTY despite false assertions to the contrary. If you disagree with FPL's accuracy, discuss it there and we can revisit it if something changes. This isn't the appropriate forum to do so. Smartyllama (talk) 19:32, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.