Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denim (color)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 01:37, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Denim (color)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable shade of Crayola. bobrayner (talk) 17:57, 11 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Denim is a widely used material in fashion and therefore its color is notable and should be kept in Wikipedia. Keraunos (talk) 01:04, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * We already have an article on Denim; you just linked to it. However, just because X is notable does not mean that anything related to X deserves an article of its own. The shade of Crayola is not notable. bobrayner (talk) 09:39, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 *  Delete it. Denim already has an article, which is perfectly sufficient. –jacobolus (t) 03:10, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment See also:
 * Articles for deletion/Arsenic (color)
 * Articles for deletion/Iceberg (color)
 * Articles for deletion/Mantis (color)
 * Articles for deletion/Polar bear (color)
 * Articles for deletion/Timberwolf (color)
 * Articles for deletion/Sangria (color)
 * Articles for deletion/Ceil
 * Articles for deletion/Persimmon (color)
 * Articles for deletion/Wheat (color)
 * Articles for deletion/Beaver (color)
 * Articles for deletion/Flavescent
 * Articles for deletion/Pink-orange
 * Articles for deletion/Xanadu (colour) (2nd nomination)
 * Articles for deletion/Tuscan red
 * Articles for deletion/Regalia (color)
 * Thanks for your time; bobrayner (talk) 18:25, 11 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete – unsourced. If the claim that it's a Crayola color is correct, cite a source at least. Dicklyon (talk) 06:14, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence that this word has any significant usage as a colour name. The article tells us that the word has been used as a proprietary name for a colour of a crayon, but neither the article nor any other source I have seen indicates that it has any more general use. The only reason given so far for keeping ("Denim is a widely used material in fashion and therefore its color is notable") makes no sense at all: elephant are notable enough to have an article Elephant, but it does not automatically follow that their colour is notable, and we don't have an article on Elephant (color). JamesBWatson (talk) 12:52, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  — frankie (talk) 17:17, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article provides no more information that can't be found in List of Crayola crayon colors. Also no indication of notability of this crayon color used by one particular company. While I agree that denim is a commonly used fabric, this is not about that fabric - this article is about one of the many crayon colors that Crayola makes.--Slon02 (talk) 17:17, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.