Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denis Douglin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 03:54, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Denis Douglin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable boxer does not meet WP:NBOX or WP:GNG. Peter Rehse (talk) 09:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 09:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 28 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per substantial coverage in reliable independent sources such as here. Candleabracadabra (talk) 20:55, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * That article is about his mother and the novelty of a female boxing trainer, especially one with a regular job.Mdtemp (talk) 16:16, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
 * That article is just one example, and it's about the boxer and his relationship with his mother as the article title, the photo and the article itself make clear. Candleabracadabra (talk) 17:12, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
 * That article is referenced in the article but it and the other references are not enough to show notability (substantial coverage). It was in effect a human interest piece.Peter Rehse (talk) 17:25, 29 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NBOX and notability is not inherited from your mother. His Golden Gloves titles are nice but not enough to show notability.Mdtemp (talk) 16:16, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails NBOX. Seems like every boxer has a human interest story, but not every boxer is notable.  Currently fails GNG.204.126.132.231 (talk) 16:23, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Coverage, yes; substantial coverage in what we require for athletes and any other requirements listed at WP:NBOX, no. Do not see enough WP:SIGCOV to warrant a standalone article. Mkdw talk 18:52, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.