Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denisa Legac


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:56, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Denisa Legac

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Sex therapist of no real renown, founder of various red-linked groups. CalendarWatcher (talk) 06:00, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Although I don't really see any english language coverage of her, there are a good number of hits in gnews and other archives in other languages (mainly Croatian) that look like they might constitute significant coverage of her. Playing around with google translate doesn't bring up any of them as obviously significant enough to make her pass the WP:GNG, but it'd be helpful if someone speaking croatian could take a look around for significant coverage about her Kevin Gorman (talk) 01:38, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. There's some significant topical coverage in Croatia, interviews in Nacional in 2004 and Slobodna Dalmacija in 2008, and Jutarnji list used her as a source in 2006, in 2010, also in 2010, etc. The article certainly needs help, but the person certainly appears to be at least as notable as the random 19yo footballer who played a pro game for the 11th club in Prva HNL. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 09:24, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 20:48, 17 July 2012 (UTC)




 * Weak keep this article needs help from someone who reads the languages that the sources are written in ⊂ Andyzweb ⊃ (Talk) 02:47, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I've now reduced the article to the verifiable part, which now also more precisely demonstrates the extent of the person's notability. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 09:35, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 16:46, 26 July 2012 (UTC)




 * Weak keep. Although expansion potential is limited the person does seem to be marginally notable per local press.  Timbouctou ( talk ) 10:56, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.