Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denmark–Egypt relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  13:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Denmark–Egypt relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

although they have embassies, almost all coverage is in a multilateral or football context or relates to reaction to that Danish cartoon which should be covered in International reactions to the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy. Current text should be moved to that article. LibStar (talk) 08:18, 22 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per NN. JBsupreme (talk) 08:36, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I do not post in all of these because the nature of them is self-evident. Thankfully larger articles are being made which cover multiple countries instead of the one-at-a-time bit here. Thus - this article, and others like it, are fully deletable without incurring the wrath of any group, I trust. Collect (talk) 10:57, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge into Foreign relations of Egypt, which now contains the content on relations, but not on reaction to cartoon. As a courtesy to readers, the title should be kept as a redirect - easier for them to locate the content. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:43, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete There is nothing notable in these relations. Searching Denmark for "Egypt", and Egypt for "Denmark" shows nothing. There is no secondary source saying that the relations are notable. Fails Bilateral relations. The only content in the article is the "cartoons controversy" section. That section is an exact copy of text from International reactions to the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy (which lists 37 countries under "Political Reactions" – should there be 37 separate articles repeating the information? – no). WP has already fully covered the "cartoons controversy" issue: in addition to the above article, we have controversy and descriptions and consequences and timeline and dossier and opinions and newspaper. It is not helpful to splinter coverage by duplicating text in a made-up Denmark–Egypt article. Johnuniq (talk) 03:21, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.