Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denmark–Georgia relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:29, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Denmark–Georgia relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random combination noting the external link put in by article creator refers to Georgia-France relations. Georgian foreign ministry notes no state visits by either leader, total trade less than USD12m, and only 1 bilateral memo of understanding (as opposed to real agreement) for cooperation for the implementation of the Kyoto Protocol, which means they'll both implement Kyoto really. hardly any coverage, almost all is multilateral or about a place called Denmark in Georgia (U.S. state). LibStar (talk) 16:11, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 16:25, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 16:25, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject of article is not notable, there is a distinct lack of in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources. Do not redirect as is unlikely search term. Delete completely and absolutely. Drawn Some (talk) 16:27, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Even though I am missing many, my position on this exercise is clear.  Clear these out, then have real discussion on single country articles. Collect (talk) 17:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I've added some information to the article. Denmark and Georgia have bilateral agreements in place, Denmark supports Georgia's entrance to NATO and the EU, and Denmark and Georgia have announced that they are finalizing a military cooperation agreement. Bilateral relations exist and are notable.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 05:17, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * "Denmark supports Georgia's entrance to NATO and the EU", most EU nations support other nations in the periphery joining, and they issue statements as such, it is not really a sign of actual bilateral relations, I once found a joint press statement where 2 nations in different 2 continents condemned terrorism...does that make bilateral relations? LibStar (talk) 01:19, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete None of the added information deal with these non-notable bilateral relations, as opposed to multilateral relations. Hipocrite (talk) 20:17, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete' No evidence that the topic meets the criteria for a stand alone article. (WP:N). Yilloslime T C  04:51, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete There is nothing notable in these relations. Searching Denmark for "Georgia", and Georgia for "Denmark" shows nothing. There is no secondary source saying that the relations are notable. Fails Bilateral relations. This is the same message I have posted before, but I check that it is correct each time. Johnuniq (talk) 11:39, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.