Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denmark–Kazakhstan relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:35, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Denmark–Kazakhstan relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random combination. non resident embassies. just some minor trade. LibStar (talk) 08:10, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no significant coverage, and a visit tells us nothing either way about the significance of the relationship. - Biruitorul Talk 16:52, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:14, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:14, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:N and Wikipedeia is not a directory. 203 individual articles or sections on "Foreign relations of" for each of the 200 or so sovereign nations, with a link to current info on their website as to who they have "relations" with are far more encyclopedic that 20,000 of these bilateral stubs with stale info extracted from the website of a country's foreign ministry. Edison (talk) 03:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Closing administrator please note that editor has copy and pasted this argument in 7 AfDs. (As I have copy and pasted this notice also). Ikip (talk) 02:29, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * And what is your point? The stubs fail the same guidelines. It is proper to point that out, and the "Delete" arguments in each case have as much merit as if only placed in one AFD. Edison (talk) 05:16, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, not likely to be found so. This article borders on being a mere dictionary entry. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  16:01, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete since there are no reliable sources that discuss this relationship in any depth that i -- or anyone else that has looked at this article -- have uncovered.Bali ultimate (talk) 14:00, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I would just ask that when opening future AFDs for bilateral relations articles, please inform the relevant WikiProjects (in this case, WikiProject Denmark and WikiProject Central Asia) on their discussion pages. If any group of people might have specialized knowledge which could help add refs and save an article, it would probably be members of the relevant projects, and their input should be solicited. Otebig (talk) 15:10, 6 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.