Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denmark–Moldova relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nja 247 06:23, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Denmark–Moldova relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random combination, non resident embassies. No visits by either leaders, total trade is less than USD8M. Danish Foreign Ministry entry on Moldova mentions one human trafficking program for Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova. Appears to be no coverage of relations except competing in the same football competition. not really rescuable. LibStar (talk) 07:03, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. another boiler-plate creation, with not the slightest hint as to why this relationship is worth noting. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 09:43, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No third-party coverage of the topic as a whole exists. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  14:50, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Re-direct - Only for the purpose of saving the name, it can be redirected to one of the new lists on Bilateral relations. - Marcusmax ( speak ) 01:21, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, nothing here other than directory entry. Stifle (talk) 11:21, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge despite pleas of helping merge these articles, nominator continues to noiminate new articles. I have already collected all of this information to merge, so this is a pointless empty gesture, an argument over a redirect, not an article. Ikip (talk) 15:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete since i find no reliable sources that treat this relationship in a fashion that would establish notability for the relationship. Not sure what there is to "merge" since there's no sourced material in the article at the moment. Unsourced means unverified and basically useless (and also dull as dishwater -- no assertion of notability, just of the "x recognized y in year z" variety). Anyone motivated to conduct the appropriate research and use citations to support something about these two countries in some other article, will have just as much of a task in front of them after this unsourced stub is deleted as before it was deleted. This article, on a topic of no notability apparent to me, remains, so i'm not sure how the AFD is a "pointless empty gesture."Bali ultimate (talk) 20:52, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete or possible merge. There is insufficient material and notability as is, but I wouldn't oppose merging with the relevant "Diplomatic relations of..." articles. HJMitchell    You rang?  23:53, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete No reliable secondary sources for these relations. Hipocrite (talk) 04:53, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Random X-Y intersection article. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 17:34, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.