Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis Alink


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:16, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Dennis Alink

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

BLP Article with no references. Very minor coverage. Fails WP:BIO. scope_creep (talk) 15:25, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:14, 1 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment More links, sources and articles have been added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drs. Daja (talk • contribs) 12:18, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete fails all criteria of basic WP:GNGand specific WP:FILMMAKER. The article is virtually unsourced because the only reference is about a film not about him. you tried to improve the article but instead to provide reliable sources for the entire unsourced article you ended up adding only external links (while some exists already), some were even now removed as spam. &thinsp;&mdash; Ammarpad (talk) 09:17, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Added information about the documentary-style he developed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drs. Daja (talk • contribs) 14:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 07:15, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment the documentary-style addition you mentioned above is here; but it can be added by anybody, as it is only almost 2000 bytes of unsourced content. I tried to search from where it came but didn't find any reliable source and the paragraph has exceptional claim of developing new techniques. Please can you provide the sources here? &thinsp;&mdash; Ammarpad (talk)

Very fair point! I have just added links to Dutch and Belgian media as references in which the new documentary technique is discussed. comment added by Drs. Daja —Preceding undated comment added 11:29, 13 November 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:35, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - lack of significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 00:09, 23 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.