Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis Lee Foster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:14, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Dennis Lee Foster

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has no sources discussing him, I'm not finding any either on this Dennis Lee Foster. Doug Weller talk 13:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I missed the creator's comments on the article talk page saying that Foster had sent him copies of off-line reports on him, but obviously they are impossible to identify and a search for them turns up nothing. The creator also removed the BLP sources and Primary sources tags from the article. Doug Weller  talk 13:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:30, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:30, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:30, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article claims he has published lots, but GS shows that nobody has taken the slightest interest in it. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:52, 3 November 2016 (UTC)/
 * Delete. He is a prolific author of how-to books, but to pass WP:AUTHOR they need to have significant reviews, and to pass WP:PROF they need to be widely used as textbooks in higher education. Neither appears to be the case. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:14, 6 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.