Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis Robertson (ice hockey)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 05:37, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Dennis Robertson (ice hockey)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 12:59, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards,  KC Velaga   ✉  14:38, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards,  KC Velaga   ✉  14:38, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Regards,  KC Velaga   ✉  14:38, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Regards,  KC Velaga   ✉  14:39, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete non-notable hockey player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:31, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:28, 25 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:04, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable fringe minor-leaguer, fails NHOCKEY and no evidence of meeting the GNG beyond routine sports coverage explicitly debarred by WP:ROUTINE. Article created by editor notorious for routinely defying consensus on notability criteria, resulting in hundreds of AfDs/CSDs/PRODs and his eventual community ban from new article creation.   Ravenswing   12:56, 2 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.