Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dent-de-Leone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 09:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Dent-de-Leone

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. I couldn't find a suitable WP:ATD. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn (talk) 16:26, 19 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Ganesha811 (talk) 14:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  01:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and England.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  18:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. Don't think it needs to pass WP:NBAND Geschichte (talk) 23:33, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * WP:NORG probably. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that discuss the topic company directly and an in in-depth manner, none of the references I found meet the criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 20:47, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.