Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dentler Erdmann (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Belmont High School (Los Angeles, California). Davewild (talk) 18:55, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Dentler Erdmann
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Last AfD resulted in no consensus 6 years ago. This has been tagged for notability for 7 years. I think that this could possibly be a valid redirect, preferably to Belmont High School (Los Angeles, California), but he doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY criteria for an independent article. Boleyn (talk) 06:56, 18 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 06:56, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Redirect to Belmont High School (Los Angeles, California). REthinking in light of first AFD. Sourcing now.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:30, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect. There's no clear claim to notability (a state teacher of the year award is not in any guideline), so I agree that redirect would be a good choice here. Agricola44 (talk) 15:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC).
 * Redirect. I think to make a case for notability on what the article presents, we'd need better sources than a local one-man newsmagazine and a line in a state database. Actually, the first AfD did dig up one better source but although it's a much more major newspaper it's still just one line about the subject, not enough I think for WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * comment There may be enough on Erdman to make an article, but it will take significant digging, since his career predates the web.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:53, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:11, 26 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:02, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.