Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dentons Green


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:20, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Dentons Green

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Dentons Green lies within the boundary of Windle, St Helens and is little other than a suburb within a town, of no notability. Article was established in 2007, and has not established notability in that time, content can be moved to Windle article or main St Helens article (however little of the content is of any value. Koncorde (talk) 11:52, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete This is not a village, but just an unofficial neighborhood, and therefore not presumptively notable. Nothing in the neighborhood mentioned in the article even bears the neighborhood name.   DGG ( talk ) 17:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * It isn't a parish, a ward or a separate village, but St Helens Council recognises it as a neighbourhood and the Royal Mail includes it in some addresses for the area. I oppose deletion, as merging (or redirecting) should be considered instead. Peter E. James (talk) 19:31, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * It's a neighbourhood of Windle Ward, Parish and historical Township, and a Suburb of St Helens, Merseyside. Its claim to notability are non-existent. Most of the content claimed as "Dentons Green" is historically associated with Windle. Redirecting to the Windle, St Helens article would suffice in terms of at least centralising the subject within an area with established notability. Koncorde (talk) 21:33, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The content has now been transferred, well the parts that are of any merit anyway. So deletion or redirect. Whichever is cleanest and/or seen as merited.Koncorde (talk) 00:17, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 01:41, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect as content has been merged. Thryduulf (talk) 11:16, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.