Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dentroid


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete per CSD G1. Nacon kantari 00:52, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Dentroid
Bollocks. Article author deleted nonsense tag and left a plea on the talk page. Weregerbil 14:07, 15 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I believe weregerbil is either ignorant of his folk history or perhaps a member of a growing group of Dentroid-deniers, who believe that by claiming the creature's non-existense they might escape its wrath. Beware Dentroid-deniers the hour of the beast approacheth! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chicobaba (talk • contribs)
 * Yes, I am the mighty Overlord of Dentroid Deniers' Conspiracy Guild! Speedy delete nonsensehoax. Weregerbil 14:22, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Chicobaba. Vizjim 14:35, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Changing vote to speedy delete as patent nonsense. Vizjim 14:03, 19 May 2006 (UTC)


 * BOLLOCKS! I love that word. Once again: BOLLOCKS! - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 14:41, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, unfunny rubbish.--Nydas 15:55, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and give someone a slap upside the head. --Crossmr 17:37, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Speedy delete this (intentional) made-up nonsense. LjL 17:49, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I realise this is rubbish but it is really funny, probably the funniest thing I've ever read...should win an award really — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.231.9 (talk • contribs)
 * Comment: that's a possibility, see the relevant page. LjL


 * Speedy delete And no more tiresome insults, please. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 19:27, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hoax and not notable. DarthVad e r 22:57, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, patent nonsense. - CNichols 17:37, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BALLS or BJAODN. Stifle (talk) 18:05, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Really not funny enough for BJAODN, and I don't think you want to encourage him. - Fan1967 21:29, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Well I thought it was funny before somebody deleted most of the content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.231.9 (talk • contribs)
 * Speedy Delete unfunny religioncruft. Danny Lilithborne 21:34, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

What the hell is going on? EricDenton 10:16, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

You're a prick Lilithborne and you are also wrong. Please don't interfere. You're not big (your boyfriend told me), you're not clever and you're just plain wrong.

Stop it vizjim, seriously stop it. We can play this game all day long.


 * WARNING - comments that were made to this page were edited/deleted by other users. Please review page history. LjL 15:30, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

I see everything vizjim. So there's not really any point trying to change things. I'll just change them back.

As far as I am aware this is all true... EricDenton 11:16, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - complete bollocks and not even funny. BTLizard 11:08, 19 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.