Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dentsply Sirona


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) buidhe 15:36, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Dentsply Sirona

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This dental company fails WP:NCORP notability standards. All the sources in the article are primary and trivial. Plus, nothing comes up in a Google search about them except for trivial stuff like stock price news. Adamant1 (talk) 05:17, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:37, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:37, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:37, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:38, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:38, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:38, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - Has reliable sources and significant coverage. It cites articles like Globe Newswire, Wall Street Journal, and New York Times. Koridas  ( Speak ) 04:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - Has reliable sources, significant coverage and a lengthy history. Wall Street Journal, and New York Times are independent enough. NEW i added citations from British Dental Journal, US National Library of Medicine, Iranian Endotonic Journal. The company provides an essential service, it was part of the Nasdaq 100 and likely will be AGAIN Grmike (talk) 00:46, 15 April 2020 (UTC)GRMIKE

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b<b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 02:17, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - the word DENTSPLY only refers to this company; it gives nearly 5 MILLION results in google. There are citations given in the article from dental medical journals.  the company has even opened its own dental school with both a facility and an online presence.  The dental industry doesn't generate as much excitement as other industries, that doesn't make it less relevant. notability should not even be a question given that Dentsply is one of if not the biggest dental companies in the USA.  independent sources include Wall Street Journal, New York Times, the British Dental Journal, US National Library of Medicine, Iranian Endotonic Journal.  The company provides an essential service, it was part of the Nasdaq 100 and likely will be again.Grmike (talk) 02:59, 16 April 2020 (UTC)grmike
 * Speedy keep. The subject is a very well-known dental company that is strongly covered by reliable sources, even more of which have been added since nomination.  Woerich   (talk)   02:38, 17 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.